Up to
60% OFF
before November 30th
What's new?
Product
Who uses Directual?
What can be built on Directual
What industries benefit from Directual?
Learn Directual
Why Directual?
Resources
Legal
Company

n8n vs Directual: a fork vs a Swiss Army knife

September 13, 2025

n8n is great for automating simple tasks and quickly connecting services. But if you’re building a full-fledged application with UI, roles, logic, and APIs—you’ll need something more powerful. In this article, you’ll find a clear comparison, real-world cases, and a breakdown of why Directual is about building products, not just workflows.

n8n vs Directual: a fork vs a Swiss Army knife

Introduction

To put it simply:

n8n is about automation—“connecting the dots,” making different services work together without manual hassle.

Directual is about building full-stack applications—with a database, APIs, business logic, UI, security, and scalability.

People often confuse the two and see them as analogues. But that’s like comparing a fork to a Swiss Army knife: both are food-related, but one is limited to a single function, while the other can help you survive in the mountains, open a can, fix a bike, and solve a hundred other problems.

So the main takeaway is clear right away:

  • n8n is for automating processes between existing services, building a personal assistant, or simple agents like “Telegram ↔ Gmail.”
  • Directual is for building a full product, an enterprise app, or a system with roles, APIs, and large-scale architecture.

Let’s dive deeper.

A simple metaphor

With n8n you automate a beer kiosk, with Directual—you build a brewery.
Adel Kadyrov
Adel Kadyrov
Founder of Kale Care, solopreneur

That’s the best explanation. A kiosk is a simple chain: order → payment → notification. Perfect for n8n. A brewery is supply chains, warehouse management, quality control, role-based access, interfaces for clients and admins, accounting integration, and even AI assistants. That’s Directual.

Origins and philosophy

  • n8n grew out of the idea of an open-source Zapier: a cheaper, more flexible option for those who want to control their own integrations and automations. Its philosophy is connect and automate, aimed at developers who are comfortable with Docker, Linux, and DevOps.
  • Directual was born as a full-stack no-code platform: database, APIs, workflows, UI, security. Its philosophy is to build serious products without code—but always with the option to add custom code when needed.

Use cases

n8n

  • Process automation: “if email received → send notification → write to Google Sheets.”
  • Personal assistants: linking Telegram, Gmail, Notion, calendars.
  • Marketing: newsletters, customer journeys, automated LLM-based content generation.
  • Data sync: e.g., CRM ↔ Google Sheets.
  • DevOps: CI/CD, monitoring, alerts.

Directual

  • Enterprise apps (internal tools): CRMs, LMS, client portals, admin panels. Complex UIs, multi-step forms, authentication, and role models. Example: automating HR processes at Lamoda.
  • Heavy backend systems under load: business logic, workflows, APIs, integrations. Example: risk scoring at Mokka online bank.
  • Telegram mini-apps and bots: fast launch of services inside Telegram with built-in auth, payments, and custom workflows.
  • AI agents and RAG: built-in vector DB, LLM APIs, and integrations with OpenAI, Claude, Grok, YandexGPT.

Pros and cons

n8n

💪 Pros

  • Open source & self-hosting: run it yourself, no license fees—developers love it.
  • Huge number of integrations: hundreds of ready-made nodes, from Gmail to AWS.
  • Mix of visual + code: drag-and-drop but also inject JS snippets when needed.
  • Debugging tools: easy to trace where a workflow broke.
  • Multiple triggers per workflow: listen to several events in one flow.

😕 Cons

  • Self-hosting requires DevOps & Linux skills.
  • Poor scalability: workflows lag under load, architecture gets messy.
  • Community-driven support only: no official SLA.
  • Incomplete docs: basics are fine, advanced use cases—find them on forums.
  • Large workflows become spaghetti: dozens of nodes = unreadable mess.

Directual

💪 Pros

  • Full-stack: database, API, UI, logic, roles—all under one roof. Projects are not just integrations but full-fledged apps.
  • Scalability: handles millions of records without performance loss.
  • Powerful API builder: fine-grained auth, filters, sorts, pagination, sync/async execution. Swagger docs auto-generated.
  • AI integrations + vector DB: build RAG systems & AI agents out of the box, connect OpenAI, Claude, Grok—no external DBs needed.
  • Telegram Mini Apps: deploy in hours, with payments and auth.
  • Active no-code community: fast answers on Telegram & Discord, direct support from the team and founders.

😕 Cons

  • Higher price for micro-projects: better suited for serious systems. Still, Startup plan starts at just $39/mo—cheap for a full-stack platform. Plus, users can earn D-coins by contributing to the community.
  • Steeper learning curve: lots of power, but requires diving into structures, steps, and workflows.
  • Occasional need for JS: edge cases require simple coding.
  • Interface feels heavy for beginners: multiple modules and tabs can be overwhelming at first.

Pricing & reality check

In 2025, n8n changed its model:

  • Free cloud tier is gone, only a 14-day trial remains.
  • Starter: €20–24/mo for 2,500 executions.
  • Pro: €50–60/mo for 10,000.
  • Business self-hosting: after 50k free, $0.104 per execution. 1M = $10,400/mo.

This sparked outrage. Self-hosters already pay for infra (servers, storage, bandwidth), but now also per execution. At ~1M ops/month, that’s $124,800/year—for software running on your own servers.

Directual isn’t free either—but at scale it’s cheaper: $175–249/mo for 500k ops, $840–1199 for 2M. Plus, enterprise clients get full on-prem versions with SLA, or private cloud starting at $1,750/mo—with no operation limits at all.

The illusion of “free” n8n

Community Edition is technically free. But that “free” comes with strings attached—major limitations and hidden costs.

Community Edition limits

  • No real collaboration: one admin account, no roles, no project sharing.
  • No environments/variables: no dev/test/prod setups.
  • No Git/version control: just 1-day history.
  • Security gaps: no SSO, no external secrets.
  • No real scaling: missing multi-main, log streaming, external storage.

So yes—you can run workflows. But for serious projects, CE is a toy for solo developers.

Hidden costs

  • Sysadmin overhead: Linux, Docker, SSL, backups, monitoring.
  • Scaling: Redis, queue mode, load balancers—full DevOps setup.
  • Database limits: SQLite chokes above 5–10k execs/day, need PostgreSQL.
  • Webhooks: unreliable under load.
  • Human factor: DevOps salaries = $3–5k/month.

Bottom line: “free” is misleading. CE is underpowered and expensive to operate at scale.

We started with n8n—it looked free. But soon hit walls: auth, roles, CE limits. Counted time & money—moved to Directual. Everything just works.
Mike Kruglov
Mike Kruglov
Founder of MKD no-code agency

DevOps & infra headaches: automation that doesn’t automate

Deploying n8n is easy. Running it in production isn’t.

  • No stable Terraform provider.
  • No snapshots.
  • No state management.
  • CI/CD = DIY scripts.

This means fragmented setups, harder updates, higher risk. Corporate DevOps integration demands serious effort.

Directual solves this out-of-the-box: a stable Terraform provider, Helm charts, private cloud & on-prem support, and built-in app snapshots for safe migration. That saves weeks of DevOps time.

Security of n8n: you’re your own DevSecOps

When it comes to self-hosting, security isn’t a “nice to have” — it’s a critical requirement. And here, n8n shows some real weak points.

Over the past few years, several serious vulnerabilities have been found in n8n:

  • Auth bypass, file access, and privilege escalation (e.g., CVE-2023-27562).
  • XSS via the Form Trigger node.
  • Open redirect on the login page, which could be used for session hijacking.
  • Insecure Docker images — especially if misconfigured.

Things get particularly dangerous with Docker Compose: if unnecessary ports are open, authentication isn’t enforced, or SSL is missing — your entire n8n instance can be compromised. Attackers could gain full access to your workflows, credentials, and even the host server.

There are ways to mitigate the risks:

  • Use HTTPS via a reverse proxy like NGINX.
  • Keep n8n updated manually or via CI/CD.
  • Store secrets securely in environment variables.
  • Restrict network access (e.g., via VPN).
  • Set up authentication and encryption properly.

But all of this is on you. Without an experienced DevSecOps team, running n8n securely at scale is no small feat.

With Directual, it’s a different story. Security is built-in:

  • Isolated cloud environments.
  • HTTPS and user authentication out of the box.
  • Snapshot and rollback mechanisms.
  • On-premise deployments with full support — and no risk of missing critical patches.

So when it comes to real-world, enterprise-grade usage, choosing a platform with security as a first-class citizen makes all the difference.

When to choose n8n vs Directual

n8n

  • Simple service-to-service automation (“email → Trello card → Slack”).
  • Low entry barrier for devs who like visual workflows but also want JS.
  • Self-hosted if you already have infra & DevOps.
  • Good for freelancers, small teams, prototypes, personal agents.
  • But… try using it for serious, scalable, team-based products—and you’ll hit limits fast.

Directual

  • You need a real product with UI and roles.
  • You need scale: millions of records, high responsiveness.
  • You need robust APIs & security.
  • You need AI, Web3, or enterprise-grade apps.
  • You need on-prem or private cloud with SLA.

Conclusion

Directual and n8n are not competitors. They serve different purposes.

n8n is a tool for small-scale automation and personal workflows.

Directual is a platform for building real applications and products.

Don’t get misled by n8n’s “free.” Self-hosting requires DevOps and infra, and at scale becomes way more expensive.

So: if you just need autopilot for a few services—pick n8n.

But if you’re building a “factory” with scale and ambition—you need Directual.

FAQ

Is n8n really free?
Is n8n really free?

Technically, the Community Edition of n8n is free. But in practice, it’s far from it: self-hosting requires infrastructure, DevOps skills, proper security setup, and constant maintenance. In 2025, n8n introduced a Business plan for self-hosting — with per-execution billing. 1 million executions per month will cost you $10,400. “Free” only works for small side projects with expert support.

How secure is n8n?
How secure is n8n?

Security in n8n heavily depends on how you configure the server. There have been several major vulnerabilities (auth bypass, XSS, open redirects). If Docker Compose is misconfigured — open ports, no SSL, outdated images — attackers can gain full server control. Without a DevOps/security specialist, n8n can become a serious attack surface.

What are the limitations of n8n Community Edition?
What are the limitations of n8n Community Edition?

Community Edition lacks:

  • roles and team collaboration;
  • environment variables and dev/test/prod setups;
  • Git or version control;
  • SSO and external secrets;
  • multi-main mode, log streaming, external binary storage.

You get full node access, but most advanced, enterprise-grade features are paywalled or require hacks. It’s great for solo workflows — not for production systems.

How much does n8n cost at scale?
How much does n8n cost at scale?

Cloud pricing: $50–60/month for 10,000 executions.

Self-hosted: after 50,000 free executions, you pay $0.104 per run.

That’s $10,400/month for 1 million executions — even if you run it on your own infrastructure. Add server costs, ops, monitoring — and n8n becomes more expensive than integrated full-stack platforms.

Is n8n good for business apps?
Is n8n good for business apps?

Only for very simple use cases. If your product needs user interfaces, roles, scalable APIs, and secure access control — n8n hits limits fast. Team collaboration is missing, versioning is primitive, and scaling requires DevOps-level effort. It’s a tool for workflows, not serious apps.

What’s the best alternative to n8n for building apps?
What’s the best alternative to n8n for building apps?

Directual isn’t just an alternative — it’s a different beast. It’s a full-stack platform: databases, logic, API builder, UI, RBAC, AI agents — all in one place.

It ships with:

  • built-in vector DB for RAG;
  • OpenAI, Claude, Grok integration;
  • Terraform provider and Helm charts;
  • snapshot-based app migration;
  • on-premise and private cloud options with SLA.

Perfect if you need to build real apps — not just connect dots.

Ready to build your dream app?

Join 22,000+ no-coders using Directual and create something you can be proud of—both faster and cheaper than ever before. It’s easy to start thanks to the visual development UI, and just as easy to scale with powerful, enterprise-grade databases and backend.